I don't assume a liquidity sweep is a reversal just because a high or low gets taken. I look for what happens after the sweep. If price shows strong displacement, breaks market structure, and holds the new structure, I'm interested in a reversal. If price quickly reclaims the trend and keeps making higher highs or lower lows, I treat the sweep as liquidity for continuation. The sweep gets my attention—the reaction determines the trade.
Agreed. Liquidity sweeps grab attention, but market structure and follow-through determine whether it's a reversal or continuation
That’s a solid approach treating the sweep as information, not a signal, and letting the post-sweep structure confirm whether it’s reversal or continuation.
